GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
VS
Radeon HD 7750M

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 7750M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

2013Core: 1046 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7750M

2012Core: 575 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is positioned at rank 109 and the Radeon HD 7750M is on rank 353, so the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
615%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
591%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
584%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
583%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
582%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
578%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
571%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
569%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
564%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
562%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
555%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
554%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
544%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
544%
#94
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
678%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
95%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
94%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
93%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
92%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
89%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
89%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
88%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7750M

#343
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
993%
#345
900%
#346
898%
#350
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
817%
#351
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
811%
#353
Radeon HD 7750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
100%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
97%
#361
97%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2.

InsightGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon HD 7750M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and Radeon HD 7750M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2013. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1046 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 49W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon HD 7750M

The Radeon HD 7750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 7750M reaches 1,191 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7750M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750M). Raw compute: 0.8033 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon HD 7750M
G3D Mark Score
1,168
1,191+2%
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8033 TFLOPS+36%
0.5888 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon HD 7750M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 7750M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 128 KB (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7750M) — the Radeon HD 7750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon HD 7750M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 12 (Radeon HD 7750M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon HD 7750M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750M). Decoder: PureVideo HD 5 vs UVD3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7750M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon HD 7750M
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD 5
UVD3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 draws 49W versus the Radeon HD 7750M's 28W — a 54.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7750M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon HD 7750M
TDP
49W
28W-43%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65-13%
75°C
Perf/Watt
23.8
42.5+79%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon HD 7750M
MSRP
$99
Avg Price (30d)
$99
Codename
GK208
Chelsea
Release
May 29 2013
April 24 2012
Ranking
#786
#827