FireStream 9250 vs Radeon 610M

FireStream 9250

2008Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon 610M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9250

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Radeon 610M

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FireStream 9250 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (1,165 vs 1,157), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 55nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FireStream 9250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 610M has the stronger long-term case.

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon 610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9250

The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

AMD

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M).

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon 610M
G3D Mark Score
1,165
1,157
Architecture
TeraScale
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
800+525%
128
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS+78%
0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+300%
4
TMUs
40+400%
8
L1 Cache
160 KB+400%
32 KB
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon 610M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 610M carries 512 MB. FireStream 9250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and System on the Radeon 610M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FireStream 9250) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon 610M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9250) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon 610M
DirectX
10.1
12 (12_2)+19%
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9250) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon 610M
Encoder
None
VCN 4.0
Decoder
UVD 2.0
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon 610M
TDP
150W
15W-90%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
234mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown
Perf/Watt
7.8
77.1+888%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 610M (2023 vs 2008).

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon 610M
MSRP
$999
Codename
RV770
Dragon Range
Release
June 16 2008
January 3 2023
Ranking
#840
#843

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.