
FireStream 9250

Radeon HD 5750
FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 5750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 5750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9250
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌668.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ❌74.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 86W.
Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $869 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 671.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 86W instead of 150W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 5750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,165 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+11% | 720 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+11% | 36 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+122% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5750.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon HD 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 86W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 234mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 13.6+74% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5750 was 87% cheaper ($869 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 650% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 5750 (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $130-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 9.0+650% |
| Codename | RV770 | Juniper |
| Release | June 16 2008 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #840 | #834 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















