FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 5750

FireStream 9250

2008Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5750

2009Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 5750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9250

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 668.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • 74.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 86W.

Radeon HD 5750

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $869 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 671.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Draws 86W instead of 150W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 5750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (1,169 vs 1,165), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $869 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 671.1% (9.0 vs 1.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FireStream 9250 has the stronger long-term case.

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9250

The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 5750
G3D Mark Score
1,165
1,169
Architecture
TeraScale
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800+11%
720
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS
1.008 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+11%
36
L1 Cache
160 KB+122%
72 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 5750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5750.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 5750
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 5750
Encoder
None
Decoder
UVD 2.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon HD 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 5750
TDP
150W
86W-43%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
234mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown
Perf/Watt
7.8
13.6+74%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5750 was 87% cheaper ($869 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 650% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 5750 (2009 vs 2008).

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 5750
MSRP
$999
$130-87%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
9.0+650%
Codename
RV770
Juniper
Release
June 16 2008
October 13 2009
Ranking
#840
#834

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.