FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

FireStream 9250

2008Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9250

2008

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FireStream 9250 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 566% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $849 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 570% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (1,172 vs 1,165), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $849 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 570% (7.8 vs 1.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FireStream 9250 has the stronger long-term case.

FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9250

The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 55 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200).

FeatureFireStream 9250Iris Pro Graphics 5200
G3D Mark Score
1,165
1,172
Architecture
TeraScale
Generation 7.5
Process Node
55 nm
22 nm
Shading Units
800+150%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS+30%
0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+300%
4
TMUs
40
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9250Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. FireStream 9250 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

FeatureFireStream 9250Iris Pro Graphics 5200
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureFireStream 9250Iris Pro Graphics 5200
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
234mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown
Perf/Watt
7.8
39.1+401%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 85% cheaper ($849 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 550% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureFireStream 9250Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP
$999
$150-85%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
7.8+550%
Codename
RV770
Haswell GT3e
Release
June 16 2008
May 27 2013
Ranking
#840
#835

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.