
FireStream 9250

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9250
2008Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FireStream 9250 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌566% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $849 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 570% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 55 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,165 | 1,172 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+150% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS+30% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. FireStream 9250 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 234mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 39.1+401% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 85% cheaper ($849 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 550% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $150-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 7.8+550% |
| Codename | RV770 | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | June 16 2008 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #840 | #835 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















