
FirePro M4170

Radeon 610M
FirePro M4170 vs Radeon 610M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4170 vs Radeon 610M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M4170 vs Radeon 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- β2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Radeon 610M
2023Why buy it
- β Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020β2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- β Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- β More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020β2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4170 vs Radeon 610M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon 610M
The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,157 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+200% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+23% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 2200 MHz+144% |
| ROPs | 8+100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 24+200% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+200% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 610M carries 512 MB. FirePro M4170 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and System on the Radeon 610M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M4170) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) β the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: UVD vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W β a 163.6% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 77.1+888% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 610M (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | β |
| Codename | Opal | Dragon Range |
| Release | April 23 2015 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #838 | #843 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















