Firepro W4190M vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Firepro W4190M is positioned at rank 45 and the Radeon R7 A8-7690K is on rank 97, so the Firepro W4190M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Firepro W4190M

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

95%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

94%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

94%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

86%

#30

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

506%

#45

Firepro W4190M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#48

Quadro K3100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400

98%

#50

Quadro K5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509

96%

#51

Radeon PRO W6300

MSRP: $200|Avg: $150

95%

#52

Quadro K4100M

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261

95%

#58

Quadro K2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

86%

#60

Intel Arc Pro A60

MSRP: $380|Avg: $380

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7690K

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

509%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

489%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

483%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

482%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

481%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

478%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

472%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

471%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

466%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

465%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

459%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

458%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

450%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

450%

#81

Moore Threads MTT S80

MSRP: $260|Avg: $170

97%

#82

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

561%

#82

Intel UHD Graphics P750

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

87%

#83

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G

MSRP: $299|Avg: $100

86%

#97

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

100%

#98

GeForce GT 1010

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

97%

#99

Radeon R7 430

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

97%

#101

Radeon 550X

MSRP: $109|Avg: $45

95%

#102

GeForce GT 720

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

94%

#103

Radeon R7 240

MSRP: $69|Avg: $15

92%

#104

Radeon R7 G

MSRP: $69|Avg: $51

88%

#107

Radeon R7 250

MSRP: $89|Avg: $25

83%

#108

GeForce GT 640

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

83%

#109

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

83%

#111

Radeon HD 8550D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

80%

#112

Radeon 520

MSRP: $78|Avg: $78

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Firepro W4190M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-7690K.

Insight	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Firepro W4190M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Firepro W4190M Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 A8-7690K Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Firepro W4190M and Radeon R7 A8-7690K

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Radeon R7 A8-7690K reaches 1,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7690K uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
G3D Mark Score	1,168+2%	1,141
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	1.997 TFLOPS+189%
Boost Clock	900 MHz	975 MHz+8%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	64+167%
L1 Cache	96 KB	256 KB+167%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Firepro W4190M) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7690K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro W4190M) vs 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
DirectX	12 (FL11_1)	12
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD4 (Firepro W4190M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Decoder: VCE1 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
Encoder	UVD4	VCE 2.0
Decoder	VCE1	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7690K's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.