
FirePro M4170

Radeon R7 A8-7690K
FirePro M4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 14.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 144.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.3 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon R7 A8-7690K
The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the Radeon R7 A8-7690K reaches 1,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7690K uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7690K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168+2% | 1,141 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+189% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 975 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7690K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7690K carries 512 MB. FirePro M4170 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7690K. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M4170) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7690K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7690K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7690K |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7690K |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7690K's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7690K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 11.4+46% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4170 came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 A8-7690K launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7690K was 60% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 14.3 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7690K offers 146.6% better value.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7690K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $80-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 14.3+147% |
| Codename | Opal | Trinidad |
| Release | April 23 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #838 | #467 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















