CPU
GPU
Radeon 610M
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M275
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 610M is positioned at rank 346 and the Radeon R9 M275 is on rank 543, so the Radeon 610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M275 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M275.
| Insight | Radeon 610M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 610M and Radeon R9 M275
Radeon 610M
The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.
Radeon R9 M275
The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 610M scores 1,157 and the Radeon R9 M275 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 610M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,157+4% | 1,115 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 640+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5632 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+110% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+138% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 16+300% |
| TMUs | 8 | 40+400% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 610M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R9 M275). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12 (FL11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M) vs UVD3 (Radeon R9 M275). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash (Radeon R9 M275).
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD3 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 610M draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 610M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.1+417% | 14.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $300 |
| Codename | Dragon Range | Venus |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #843 | #851 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 610M and Radeon R9 M275
