Radeon R9 M275
VS
Radeon R7 430

Radeon R9 M275 vs Radeon R7 430

AMD

Radeon R9 M275

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 430

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M275 is positioned at rank 543 and the Radeon R7 430 is on rank 99, so the Radeon R7 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275

#532
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2919%
#534
2646%
#535
2639%
#539
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2399%
#540
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2383%
#542
Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#543
Radeon R9 M275
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#544
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
99%
#545
99%
#546
98%
#547
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#548
98%
#549
98%
#550
98%
#551
98%
#552
Radeon R5 M255
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#553
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
96%
#554
Mobility Radeon HD 530v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#555
95%
#557
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 430

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
524%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
504%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
498%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
497%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
496%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
493%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
487%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
485%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
480%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
479%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
473%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
472%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
464%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
464%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
100%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
89%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
88%
#84
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
578%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
98%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
97%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
91%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
85%
#108
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
85%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
85%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
82%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
81%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 430.

InsightRadeon R9 M275Radeon R7 430
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 430 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 430 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $300), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1860.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M275Radeon R7 430
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1860.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275 and Radeon R7 430

AMD

Radeon R9 M275

The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.

AMD

Radeon R7 430

The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M275 scores 1,115 and the Radeon R7 430 reaches 1,093 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 430). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275Radeon R7 430
G3D Mark Score
1,115+2%
1,093
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.184 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+69%
Boost Clock
925 MHz
975 MHz+5%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L1 Cache
160 KB
256 KB+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M275Radeon R7 430
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 430) — the Radeon R7 430 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275Radeon R7 430
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
64 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M275 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 430's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M275 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275) vs 300W (Radeon R7 430). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275Radeon R7 430
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
14.9+37%
10.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon R7 430 launched at $79 and now averages $15. The Radeon R7 430 costs 95% less ($285 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) vs 72.9 (Radeon R7 430) — the Radeon R7 430 offers 1870.3% better value. The Radeon R7 430 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R9 M275Radeon R7 430
MSRP
$300
$79-74%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$15-95%
Performance per Dollar
3.7
72.9+1870%
Codename
Venus
Trinidad
Release
January 28 2014
June 18 2015
Ranking
#851
#467