Radeon R9 M275X
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon R9 M275X vs GeForce GTX 1060

AMD

Radeon R9 M275X

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M275X is positioned at rank #460 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X

#450
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1996%
#452
1809%
#453
1804%
#457
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1641%
#458
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1630%
#460
Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#461
GeForce 8400 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#462
Mobility Radeon HD 550v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#463
Radeon HD 8280G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#464
Radeon R7 M340
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
99%
#465
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
99%
#466
98%
#467
Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#468
Radeon R5 M230
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
98%
#469
Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#470
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#471
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
96%
#472
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#473
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#474
94%
#475
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 517% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M275X.

InsightRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-517%)
Leading raw performance (+517%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $300), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 2985.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2985.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275X and GeForce GTX 1060

AMD

Radeon R9 M275X

The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R9 M275X scores 1,631 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 517%. The Radeon R9 M275X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
1,631
10,064+517%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
640
2560+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.184 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+649%
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1733 MHz+87%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
L1 Cache
160 KB
960 KB+500%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M275X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
192 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12_0
12
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (Pascal).

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M275X draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
75W-58%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
Mobile
6-pin
Length
1mm
173mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
21.7
55.9+158%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 80% less ($240 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 3005.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$300
$249-17%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$60-80%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
167.7+3006%
Codename
Venus
GP104
Release
January 28 2014
May 27 2016
Ranking
#746
#137