Radeon R9 M275X
VS
Quadro P400

Radeon R9 M275X vs Quadro P400

AMD

Radeon R9 M275X

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P400

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1252 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M275X is positioned at rank 460 and the Quadro P400 is on rank 143, so the Quadro P400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X

#450
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1996%
#452
1809%
#453
1804%
#457
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1641%
#458
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1630%
#460
Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#461
GeForce 8400 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#462
Mobility Radeon HD 550v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#463
Radeon HD 8280G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#464
Radeon R7 M340
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
99%
#465
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
99%
#466
98%
#467
Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#468
Radeon R5 M230
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
98%
#469
Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#470
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#471
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
96%
#472
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#473
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#474
94%
#475
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
92%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
88%
#128
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1504%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
100%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
98%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
96%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
94%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
93%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
93%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
92%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
92%
#155
Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP: $300|Avg: $120
90%
#158
Quadro M2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $70
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M275X.

InsightRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $300), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 408.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+408.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275X and Quadro P400

AMD

Radeon R9 M275X

The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P400

The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M275X scores 1,631 and the Quadro P400 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1252 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
G3D Mark Score
1,631
1,659+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640+150%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.184 TFLOPS+85%
0.641 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1252 MHz+35%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+150%
16
L1 Cache
160 KB+67%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M275X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P400 has 2 GB. The Quadro P400 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 512 KB (Quadro P400) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 12_1 (Quadro P400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
DirectX
12_0
12_1
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC 4th Gen
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M275X draws 75W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
145mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
21.7
55.3+155%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Quadro P400 launched at $169 and now averages $60. The Quadro P400 costs 80% less ($240 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 27.6 (Quadro P400) — the Quadro P400 offers 411.1% better value. The Quadro P400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R9 M275XQuadro P400
MSRP
$300
$169-44%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$60-80%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
27.6+411%
Codename
Venus
GP107
Release
January 28 2014
February 7 2017
Ranking
#746
#741