GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Quadro P400
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Quadro P400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Quadro P400?
The comparison between the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and the Quadro P400 serves as a stark reminder of the difference between an enthusiast-grade gaming beast and a entry-level legacy professional card. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a 2024 powerhouse with 16GB of VRAM and the latest Ada Lovelace architecture. The Quadro P400 is a tiny, low-profile Pascal-based card from 2017 designed for basic multi-monitor setups and light CAD work.\n\nIn terms of performance, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is in a different universe, offering more than 50 times the rendering speed in many benchmarks. It enables elite 4K gaming and professional-grade rendering with hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI upscaling. The Quadro P400, while useful for providing extra display outputs in a workspace, lacks the horsepower for even basic modern gaming and struggles with anything beyond the simplest 3D models.\n\nFor any user looking for a real performance solution, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a massive, high-end upgrade. The Quadro P400 remains a niche tool for office environments where space and power consumption are the only constraints, but for any creative or gaming task, it is completely outclassed by the modern GeForce flagship.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1803.4% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P400.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1803.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1803.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 93.6% better value per dollar than the Quadro P400.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+93.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro P400
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro P400's 1,659 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 1803.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1252 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+1803% | 1,659 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+2900% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+6154% | 0.641 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+108% | 1252 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+1400% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+8233% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P400 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro P400) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12_1 (Quadro P400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 161.9% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 30W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 145mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+100% | 55.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Quadro P400 launched at $169 and now averages $60. The Quadro P400 costs 89.8% less ($530 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 27.6 (Quadro P400) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 93.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $169-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $60-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+94% | 27.6 |
| Codename | AD104 | GP107 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #11 | #741 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro P400
