Radeon R9 M275X vs Intel UHD Graphics P750
Radeon R9 M275X
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M275X is positioned at rank #460 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The Intel UHD Graphics P750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M275X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M275X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $300 for the Radeon R9 M275X, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 207% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+207%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275X and Intel UHD Graphics P750
Radeon R9 M275X
The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.
Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M275X scores 1,631 and the Intel UHD Graphics P750 reaches 1,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,631 | 1,669+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 640+150% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS+78% | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1300 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M275X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M275X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | QuickSync |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M275X draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 21.7 | 111.3+413% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 launched at $150 and now averages $100. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 costs 66.7% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) vs 16.7 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) — the Intel UHD Graphics P750 offers 209.3% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $150-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $100-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 16.7+209% |
| Codename | Venus | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | January 28 2014 | 2021 |
| Ranking | #746 | #717 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M275X and Intel UHD Graphics P750
