CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 M280X
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 635
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M280X is positioned at rank 285 and the GeForce GT 635 is on rank 152, so the GeForce GT 635 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M280X
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 635
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 635.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M280X | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 635 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 635 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 148.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M280X | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+148.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M280X and GeForce GT 635
Radeon R9 M280X
The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.
GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M280X scores 814 and the GeForce GT 635 reaches 810 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 635 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 352 (GeForce GT 635). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 814 | 810 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+482% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+379% | 0.8554 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+191% | 44 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 704 KB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M280X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 635 has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M280X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 635) — the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M280X draws 200W versus the GeForce GT 635's 200W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 635 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 200W (GeForce GT 635). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 200W-43% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1+2% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GT 635 launched at $99 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 635 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 40.5 (GeForce GT 635) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 148.5% better value. The Radeon R9 M280X is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $99-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $20-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3 | 40.5+148% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GF100 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #404 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M280X and GeForce GT 635
