CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 M280X
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M280X is positioned at rank 285 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is on rank 224, so the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M280X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $100 for the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 102% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Radeon R9 M280X
The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M280X scores 814 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 814 | 806 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+1068% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2920 MHz+192% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 128 | 256+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 8 MB+967% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M280X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M280X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 8 MB+967% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M280X draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 M280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-33% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1+52% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169 and now averages $100. The Radeon R9 M280X costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 8.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R9 M280X offers 101.2% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $169-32% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+101% | 8.1 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 48 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #404 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
