CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 M280X
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M280X is positioned at rank 285 and the Radeon HD 7670 is on rank 401, so the Radeon R9 M280X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M280X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7670.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 97.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon HD 7670
Radeon R9 M280X
The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon HD 7670
The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M280X scores 814 and the Radeon HD 7670 reaches 803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7670). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 814+1% | 803 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+327% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+611% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+967% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M280X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670 has 1 GB. The Radeon R9 M280X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7670) — the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M280X draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 7670's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 45W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 17.8+334% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 7670 launched at $100 and now averages $25. The Radeon HD 7670 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 32.1 (Radeon HD 7670) — the Radeon HD 7670 offers 96.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M280X is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $100-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $25-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3 | 32.1+97% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Turks |
| Release | October 8 2013 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #404 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon HD 7670
