Radeon R9 M370X
VS
FirePro M4000

Radeon R9 M370X vs FirePro M4000

AMD

Radeon R9 M370X

2015Core: 800 MHz
VS

FirePro M4000

2012Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M370X is positioned at rank #471 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M370X

#461
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2076%
#463
1882%
#464
1877%
#468
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1707%
#469
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1695%
#471
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
100%
#472
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#473
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
98%
#474
97%
#475
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#476
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: $118
97%
#478
97%
#479
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP: $699|Avg: $150
96%
#480
Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
95%
#481
Radeon R5 M330
MSRP: $120|Avg: $20
95%
#482
Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#483
GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
94%
#484
Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
92%
#485
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
92%
#486
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro M4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M370X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro M4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 238.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+238.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M370X and FirePro M4000

AMD

Radeon R9 M370X

The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.

AMD

FirePro M4000

The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M370X scores 1,570 and the FirePro M4000 reaches 1,596 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M370X is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro M4000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 512 (FirePro M4000).

FeatureRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
G3D Mark Score
1,570
1,596+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+25%
512

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M370X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M4000 has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 12 (FirePro M4000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
DirectX
12 (FL 11_1)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4000). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M4000).

FeatureRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M370X draws 75W versus the FirePro M4000's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 350W (FirePro M4000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
TDP
75W
33W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
82mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
20.9
48.4+132%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FirePro M4000 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The FirePro M4000 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.7 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 53.2 (FirePro M4000) — the FirePro M4000 offers 238.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M370X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon R9 M370XFirePro M4000
MSRP
$300
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$30-70%
Performance per Dollar
15.7
53.2+239%
Codename
Cape Verde
Chelsea
Release
May 19 2015
June 27 2012
Ranking
#758
#752