CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 M370X
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M370X is positioned at rank #471 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M370X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M370X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M370X | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 101.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M370X | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+101.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M370X and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Radeon R9 M370X
The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M370X scores 1,570 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M370X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,570 | 1,582 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M370X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M370X draws 75W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.9 | 105.5+405% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 and now averages $50. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.7 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers 101.3% better value. The Radeon R9 M370X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $150-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $50-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.7 | 31.6+101% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | May 19 2015 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #758 | #755 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M370X and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
