Radeon R9 M370X vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon R9 M370X
Popular choices:
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M370X is positioned at rank #471 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M370X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M370X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M370X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M370X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M370X and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon R9 M370X
The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M370X scores 1,570 and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 reaches 1,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M370X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,570+2% | 1,538 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M370X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M370X draws 75W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.9 | 102.5+390% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.7 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon R9 M370X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M370X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | May 19 2015 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #758 | #763 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M370X and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
