
Radeon R9 M375
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M375 is positioned at rank 565 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is on rank 524, so the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $300), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 649.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+649.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual

Radeon R9 M375
The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 997 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M375 scores 998 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual reaches 997 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M375) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 998 | 997 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M375 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M375 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M375 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M375) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 19.9+50% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual launched at $250 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) vs 24.9 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual) — the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers 654.5% better value. The Radeon R9 M375 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $250-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $40-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 24.9+655% |
| Codename | Tropo | — |
| Release | May 5 2015 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #889 | #863 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













