
Radeon R9 M375 vs Radeon HD 8690M

Radeon R9 M375
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8690M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M375 is positioned at rank 565 and the Radeon HD 8690M is on rank 247, so the Radeon HD 8690M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8690M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8690M.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M375 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon HD 8690M

Radeon R9 M375
The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.

Radeon HD 8690M
The Radeon HD 8690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 984 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M375 scores 998 and the Radeon HD 8690M reaches 984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8690M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M375) vs 320 (Radeon HD 8690M). Raw compute: 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375) vs 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690M). Boost clocks: 1015 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 998+1% | 984 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+100% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.299 TFLOPS+146% | 0.528 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1015 MHz+23% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+100% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M375 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8690M has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M375 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M375) vs 128 KB (Radeon HD 8690M) — the Radeon R9 M375 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_1 (Radeon R9 M375) vs 12 (Radeon HD 8690M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_1 | 12+9% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M375) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8690M). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M375 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8690M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8690M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M375) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8690M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 19.7+48% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M375 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | — |
| Codename | Tropo | Sun |
| Release | May 5 2015 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #889 | #891 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















