
Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 760M

Radeon R9 M375X
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M375X is positioned at rank 422 and the GeForce GTX 760M is on rank 97, so the GeForce GTX 760M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375X
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M375X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M375X | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 760M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M375X | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M375X and GeForce GTX 760M

Radeon R9 M375X
The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.

GeForce GTX 760M
The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M375X scores 1,711 and the GeForce GTX 760M reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M375X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 760M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760M). Raw compute: 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M). Boost clocks: 1015 MHz vs 657 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,711 | 1,726 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 768+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.299 TFLOPS+29% | 1.009 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1015 MHz+54% | 657 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+150% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M375X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M375X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M375X draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760M's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 55W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 22.8 | 31.4+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760M costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.2 (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 43.1 (GeForce GTX 760M) — the GeForce GTX 760M offers 26% better value. The Radeon R9 M375X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.2 | 43.1+26% |
| Codename | Tropo | GK106 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #727 | #725 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















