
Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 5830

Radeon R9 M375X
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5830
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M375X is positioned at rank #422 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5830 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M375X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M375X | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5830 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5830 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 68.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M375X | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+68.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M375X and Radeon HD 5830

Radeon R9 M375X
The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.

Radeon HD 5830
The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M375X scores 1,711 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M375X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,711 | 1,726 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1120+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.299 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+38% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+43% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M375X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 has 1 GB. The Radeon R9 M375X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon HD 5830) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon HD 5830. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 128 GB/s+60% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M375X draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 80% difference. The Radeon R9 M375X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 280mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 22.8+130% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239 and now averages $30. The Radeon HD 5830 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.2 (Radeon R9 M375X) vs 57.5 (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 offers 68.1% better value. The Radeon R9 M375X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M375X | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $239-4% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.2 | 57.5+68% |
| Codename | Tropo | Cypress |
| Release | May 5 2015 | February 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #727 | #724 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















