Radeon R9 M390X vs GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon R9 M390X
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 965M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M390X is positioned at rank 416 and the GeForce GTX 965M is on rank 39, so the GeForce GTX 965M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M390X
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M390X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 965M.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M390X | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M390X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M390X and GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon R9 M390X
The Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,895 points.
GeForce GTX 965M
The GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 944 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,860 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M390X scores 3,895 and the GeForce GTX 965M reaches 3,860 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M390X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 965M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 965M). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 2.355 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 965M).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,895 | 3,860 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS+26% | 2.355 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 965M) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon R9 M390X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 965M) — the GeForce GTX 965M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s+100% | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M390X draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 965M's 50W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 965M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 51.9 | 77.2+49% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 965M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $550 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | — |
| Codename | Amethyst | GM206S |
| Release | May 5 2015 | 2016 |
| Ranking | #504 | #510 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M390X and GeForce GTX 965M
