CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 M390X
Popular choices:
Quadro K5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M390X is positioned at rank 416 and the Quadro K5000 is on rank 313, so the Quadro K5000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M390X
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M390X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M390X | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K5000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $120), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 104.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M390X | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+104.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M390X and Quadro K5000
Radeon R9 M390X
The Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,895 points.
Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M390X scores 3,895 and the Quadro K5000 reaches 3,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M390X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,895 | 3,989+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS+37% | 2.169 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M390X draws 75W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-39% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 51.9+59% | 32.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M390X launched at $550 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Quadro K5000 launched at $2499 and now averages $60. The Quadro K5000 costs 50% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.5 (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 66.5 (Quadro K5000) — the Quadro K5000 offers 104.6% better value. The Radeon R9 M390X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $550-78% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $60-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.5 | 66.5+105% |
| Codename | Amethyst | GK104 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | August 17 2012 |
| Ranking | #504 | #492 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M390X and Quadro K5000
