
Radeon R9 M390X vs GRID P40-1Q

Radeon R9 M390X
Popular choices:

GRID P40-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M390X is positioned at rank 416 and the GRID P40-1Q is on rank 332, so the GRID P40-1Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M390X
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M390X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-1Q.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M390X | GRID P40-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M390X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M390X holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $150), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M390X | GRID P40-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M390X and GRID P40-1Q

Radeon R9 M390X
The Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,895 points.

GRID P40-1Q
The GRID P40-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,839 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M390X scores 3,895 and the GRID P40-1Q reaches 3,839 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M390X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID P40-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-1Q). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-1Q).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GRID P40-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,895+1% | 3,839 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+63% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GRID P40-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M390X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-1Q has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M390X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-1Q) — the GRID P40-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GRID P40-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M390X draws 75W versus the GRID P40-1Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R9 M390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 350W (GRID P40-1Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GRID P40-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 51.9+204% | 17.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M390X launched at $550 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GRID P40-1Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M390X costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.5 (Radeon R9 M390X) vs 25.6 (GRID P40-1Q) — the Radeon R9 M390X offers 27% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M390X | GRID P40-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $550-82% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-20% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.5+27% | 25.6 |
| Codename | Amethyst | GM204 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #504 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















