Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Radeon R9 M395X

2015Core: 723 MHz

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon R9 M395X

5,120

0.0%

Radeon HD 6970

Radeon HD8970M

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

210

5,200

+1.6%

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M395X is positioned at rank #391 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395X

#381

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1273%

#383

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1154%

#384

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1151%

#388

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1046%

#389

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1039%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

100%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

99%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

99%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

98%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

97%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

97%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#400

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

94%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

94%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

93%

#403

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

92%

#404

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

92%

#406

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395X.

Insight	Radeon R9 M395X	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 407.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 M395X	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+407.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 M395X Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395X and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M395X scores 5,120 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M395X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

Feature	Radeon R9 M395X	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
G3D Mark Score	5,120	5,200+2%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+357%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.961 TFLOPS+126%	1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	128+129%	56
L1 Cache	512 KB	896 KB+75%
L2 Cache	512 KB	640 KB+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 M395X	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — a 2.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 M395X	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	160 GB/s+3%	156 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	320-bit+25%
L2 Cache	512 KB	640 KB+25%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M395X draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 94.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon R9 M395X	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
TDP	75W-64%	210W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	Mobile	2x 6-pin
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	76°C
Perf/Watt	68.3+175%	24.8

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.1 (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 408.2% better value. The Radeon R9 M395X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).