Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M395X
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M395X is positioned at rank 391 and the Radeon R9 M295X is on rank 273, so the Radeon R9 M295X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M295X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M295X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M295X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $150), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395X and Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M395X scores 5,120 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M395X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,120 | 5,150 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 10% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 176 GB/s+10% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M395X draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 68.3+232% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 and now averages $150. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.1 (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 0.6% better value. The Radeon R9 M395X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $300-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.1 | 34.3 |
| Codename | Amethyst | Amethyst |
| Release | May 5 2015 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #438 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M395X and Radeon R9 M295X
