GeForce RTX 4060
VS
Radeon R9 M295X

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R9 M295X

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

2014Core: 723 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
111%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
107%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
105%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
104%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
103%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
103%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
101%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
100%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
100%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
98%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
98%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
98%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
97%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
96%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
95%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
94%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
94%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
92%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
92%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
92%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
91%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
91%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
91%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X

#263
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
632%
#265
573%
#266
572%
#270
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
520%
#271
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
516%
#273
Radeon R9 M295X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
100%
#274
GeForce GT 325M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
99%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
98%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
98%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
96%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
95%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M295X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 279.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M295X.

InsightGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+279.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-279.6%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 90.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon R9 M295X.

InsightGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+90.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299)
More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon R9 M295X

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 5,150 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 279.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
G3D Mark Score
19,548+280%
5,150
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072+50%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+410%
2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
96
128+33%
L1 Cache
3 MB+500%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+4700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M295X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M295X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 54.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s+55%
176 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
24 MB+4700%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
TDP
115W-54%
250W
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
Mobile
Length
240mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
73°C
Perf/Watt
170.0+725%
20.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 49.8% less ($149 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 90.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M295X
MSRP
$299
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$299
$150-50%
Performance per Dollar
65.4+91%
34.3
Codename
AD107
Amethyst
Release
May 18 2023
November 23 2014
Ranking
#84
#437