Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3070
Radeon R9 M395X
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M395X is positioned at rank #391 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395X
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M395X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 333% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M395X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-333%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+333%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 224.8% better value per dollar than the Radeon R9 M395X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M395X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+224.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395X and GeForce RTX 3070
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R9 M395X scores 5,120 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 333%. The Radeon R9 M395X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,120 | 22,172+333% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888+188% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+586% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 128 | 184+44% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 5.8 MB+1060% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M395X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 180% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 448 GB/s+180% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M395X draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.3 | 100.8+48% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The Radeon R9 M395X costs 25% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.1 (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 225.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $499-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-25% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.1 | 110.9+225% |
| Codename | Amethyst | GA104 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #438 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M395X and GeForce RTX 3070
