
Radeon R9 M470X vs Radeon R9 M290X

Radeon R9 M470X
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M470X is positioned at rank 377 and the Radeon R9 M290X is on rank 399, so the Radeon R9 M470X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M470X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M470X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M290X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M290X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M290X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $350), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 478.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+478.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M470X and Radeon R9 M290X

Radeon R9 M470X
The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.

Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M470X scores 3,244 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M470X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,244 | 3,218 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1280+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz+22% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 320 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Radeon R9 M290X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M470X draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M470X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3+34% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M470X launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 M290X costs 82.9% less ($290 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.3 (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 53.6 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Radeon R9 M290X offers 476.3% better value. The Radeon R9 M470X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-13% | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $60-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3 | 53.6+476% |
| Codename | Emerald | Neptune |
| Release | May 15 2016 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #563 | #566 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















