
Radeon R9 M470X vs Radeon 660M

Radeon R9 M470X
Popular choices:

Radeon 660M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M470X is positioned at rank 377 and the Radeon 660M is on rank 399, so the Radeon R9 M470X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M470X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 660M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 660M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon 660M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M470X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M470X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 660M.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M470X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M470X and Radeon 660M

Radeon R9 M470X
The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.

Radeon 660M
The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M470X scores 3,244 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M470X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,244 | 3,221 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS+35% | 1.459 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1900 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+133% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+75% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M470X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 660M has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M470X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 2 MB (Radeon 660M) — the Radeon 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M470X draws 75W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 40W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3 | 80.5+86% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | — |
| Codename | Emerald | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | May 15 2016 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #563 | #565 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















