Radeon R9 M485X
VS
GRID M60-4Q

Radeon R9 M485X vs GRID M60-4Q

AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

2016Core: 723 MHz
VS

GRID M60-4Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M485X is positioned at rank 393 and the GRID M60-4Q is on rank 318, so the GRID M60-4Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M485X

#383
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1285%
#385
1165%
#386
1162%
#390
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1056%
#391
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1049%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
100%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
100%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#399
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
95%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#404
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#406
92%
#407
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-4Q

#303
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9656%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
100%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
99%
#320
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
99%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
99%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
97%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
93%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
93%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
91%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
90%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
90%
#328
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
90%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
87%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
85%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
84%
#333
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M60-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M485X.

InsightRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M60-4Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M60-4Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $150), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+26%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
More affordable ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M485X and GRID M60-4Q

AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-4Q

The GRID M60-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,831 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M485X scores 3,801 and the GRID M60-4Q reaches 3,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M485X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID M60-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-4Q). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-4Q).

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
G3D Mark Score
3,801
3,831
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.961 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+63%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-4Q) — the GRID M60-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 12 (GRID M60-4Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (GRID M60-4Q). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID M60-4Q).

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
UVD 6.0
NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M485X draws 250W versus the GRID M60-4Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M60-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 350W (GRID M60-4Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
TDP
250W
225W-10%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
15.2
17.0+12%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID M60-4Q launched at $2500 and now averages $120. The GRID M60-4Q costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.3 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 31.9 (GRID M60-4Q) — the GRID M60-4Q offers 26.1% better value. The Radeon R9 M485X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XGRID M60-4Q
MSRP
$450-82%
$2500
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$120-20%
Performance per Dollar
25.3
31.9+26%
Codename
Amethyst
GM204
Release
May 15 2016
August 30 2015
Ranking
#519
#433