Radeon R9 M485X
VS
FirePro S7150

Radeon R9 M485X vs FirePro S7150

AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

2016Core: 723 MHz
VS

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M485X is positioned at rank 393 and the FirePro S7150 is on rank 315, so the FirePro S7150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M485X

#383
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1285%
#385
1165%
#386
1162%
#390
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1056%
#391
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1049%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
100%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
100%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
95%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#406
92%
#407
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
100%
#299
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9410%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
100%
#316
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
98%
#317
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
97%
#318
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
97%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
97%
#320
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
96%
#321
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
94%
#322
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
90%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
90%
#324
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
89%
#325
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
88%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
87%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
87%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
85%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M485X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro S7150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M485X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M485X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $459), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 208.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+208.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($459)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M485X and FirePro S7150

AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M485X scores 3,801 and the FirePro S7150 reaches 3,770 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M485X is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro S7150 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 2,048 (FirePro S7150). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150).

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
G3D Mark Score
3,801
3,770
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.961 TFLOPS
3.768 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M485X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7150 has 4 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 12 (FirePro S7150). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150).

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
Encoder
VCE 3.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 6.0
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M485X draws 250W versus the FirePro S7150's 150W — a 50% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 350W (FirePro S7150). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
TDP
250W
150W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
15.2
25.1+65%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 and now averages $459. The Radeon R9 M485X costs 67.3% less ($309 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.3 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 8.2 (FirePro S7150) — the Radeon R9 M485X offers 208.5% better value.

FeatureRadeon R9 M485XFirePro S7150
MSRP
$450-81%
$2399
Avg Price (30d)
$150-67%
$459
Performance per Dollar
25.3+209%
8.2
Codename
Amethyst
Tonga
Release
May 15 2016
February 1 2016
Ranking
#519
#521