
Radeon R9 M485X vs FirePro S7150

Radeon R9 M485X
Popular choices:

FirePro S7150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M485X is positioned at rank 393 and the FirePro S7150 is on rank 315, so the FirePro S7150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M485X
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M485X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro S7150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M485X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M485X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $459), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 208.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+208.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($459) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M485X and FirePro S7150

Radeon R9 M485X
The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M485X scores 3,801 and the FirePro S7150 reaches 3,770 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M485X is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro S7150 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 2,048 (FirePro S7150). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,801 | 3,770 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS | 3.768 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M485X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7150 has 4 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 12 (FirePro S7150). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M485X draws 250W versus the FirePro S7150's 150W — a 50% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 350W (FirePro S7150). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 15.2 | 25.1+65% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 and now averages $459. The Radeon R9 M485X costs 67.3% less ($309 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.3 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 8.2 (FirePro S7150) — the Radeon R9 M485X offers 208.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-81% | $2399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-67% | $459 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3+209% | 8.2 |
| Codename | Amethyst | Tonga |
| Release | May 15 2016 | February 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #519 | #521 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















