Radeon RX 470/570 vs Radeon RX 6400

AMD

Radeon RX 470/570

2016Core: 926 MHzBoost: 1206 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6400

2022Core: 1923 MHzBoost: 2321 MHz
RX family
·······

Radeon RX 470/570 vs Radeon RX 6400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 470/570 vs Radeon RX 6400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon RX 470/570 vs Radeon RX 6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 470/570

2016

Why buy it

  • 48.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 12.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $179 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • 126.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 53W.
  • 39.5% longer card at 240mm vs 172mm.

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 53W instead of 120W, a 67W reduction.
  • Measures 172mm instead of 240mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470/570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 470/570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (7,935 vs 7,728), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon RX 470/570 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 9.6% (48.6 vs 44.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon RX 470/570 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon RX 470/570 vs Radeon RX 6400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX 470/570

The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 470/570 scores 7,935 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 470/570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1206 MHz vs 2321 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 470/570Radeon RX 6400
G3D Mark Score
7,935+3%
7,728
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2048+167%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.94 TFLOPS+39%
3.565 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
2321 MHz+92%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+167%
48
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR 3 + AFMF

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon RX 470/570 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 470/570Radeon RX 6400
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 470/570 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6400 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 470/570 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 6400) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 470/570. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 470/570 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 470/570) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 470/570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 470/570Radeon RX 6400
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s+75%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon RX 470/570Radeon RX 6400
DirectX
12.0
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).

FeatureRadeon RX 470/570Radeon RX 6400
Encoder
VCE 3.4
None
Decoder
UVD 6.3
VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 470/570 draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 77.5% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 470/570) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 470/570Radeon RX 6400
TDP
120W
53W-56%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
6-pin
None
Length
240mm
172mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
66.1
145.8+121%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX 470/570 came in at $179, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6400 was 11.2% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 9.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6400 (2022 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon RX 470/570Radeon RX 6400
MSRP
$179
$159-11%
Performance per Dollar
44.3
48.6+10%
Codename
Ellesmere
Navi 24
Release
August 4 2016
January 19 2022
Ranking
#315
#330

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.