
Radeon R9 290 / 390

Radeon RX 470/570
Radeon R9 290 / 390 vs Radeon RX 470/570 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 290 / 390 vs Radeon RX 470/570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 290 / 390 vs Radeon RX 470/570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 290 / 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470/570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌83.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅9.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 24.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 290 / 390 vs Radeon RX 470/570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 290 / 390
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 scores 8,150 and the Radeon RX 470/570 reaches 7,935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 / 390 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,150+3% | 7,935 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.12 TFLOPS+4% | 4.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1206 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 / 390 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 470/570 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 290 / 390. Memory bus width is 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290 / 390 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 470/570. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 / 390 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+43% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+100% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 / 390 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 / 390 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 / 390 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 120W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 450W-40% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 240mm |
| Height | 109mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 80°C-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 27.2 | 66.1+143% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 290 / 390 came in at $329, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon RX 470/570 was 45.6% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.8 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 offers 78.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 470/570 (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 / 390 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $179-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 44.3+79% |
| Codename | Grenada | Ellesmere |
| Release | June 18 2015 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #296 | #315 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















