Radeon Pro V520
VS
Radeon R9 290 / 390

Radeon Pro V520 vs Radeon R9 290 / 390

AMD

Radeon Pro V520

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1600 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro V520 is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
90%
#124
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1477%
#139
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
100%
#140
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
100%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
99%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
99%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
98%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
96%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
94%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
92%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
92%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
91%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
91%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro V520 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro V520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro V520.

InsightRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
Standard Size (275mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro V520, it costs 78% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 370.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+370.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($65)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 and Radeon R9 290 / 390

AMD

Radeon Pro V520

The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V520 scores 8,000 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Boost clocks: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
G3D Mark Score
8,000
8,150+2%
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
2560+11%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.373 TFLOPS+44%
5.12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1600 MHz+60%
1000 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144
160+11%
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
512-bit+300%
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).

FeatureRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
Encoder
VCN 2.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V520 draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon Pro V520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro V520) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 95°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
TDP
225W-25%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W-53%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
275mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C-11%
95°C
Perf/Watt
35.6+31%
27.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 launched at $329 and now averages $65. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 costs 78.3% less ($235 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.7 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 125.4 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon R9 290 / 390 offers 369.7% better value. The Radeon Pro V520 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro V520Radeon R9 290 / 390
MSRP
$800
$329-59%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$65-78%
Performance per Dollar
26.7
125.4+370%
Codename
Navi 12
Grenada
Release
December 1 2020
June 18 2015
Ranking
#218
#296