
Radeon Pro V520 vs Radeon R9 290 / 390

Radeon Pro V520
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290 / 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro V520 is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro V520 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro V520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro V520.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro V520, it costs 78% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 370.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+370.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 and Radeon R9 290 / 390

Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.

Radeon R9 290 / 390
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V520 scores 8,000 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Boost clocks: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,000 | 8,150+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.373 TFLOPS+44% | 5.12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1600 MHz+60% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V520 draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon Pro V520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro V520) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-25% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-11% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.6+31% | 27.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 launched at $329 and now averages $65. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 costs 78.3% less ($235 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.7 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 125.4 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon R9 290 / 390 offers 369.7% better value. The Radeon Pro V520 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $329-59% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $65-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.7 | 125.4+370% |
| Codename | Navi 12 | Grenada |
| Release | December 1 2020 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #218 | #296 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















