
Radeon RX 540 vs Radeon 550

Radeon RX 540
Popular choices:

Radeon 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 540 is positioned at rank #235 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 540
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 540 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 540 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 540 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $79), it costs 49% less, resulting in a 96.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($79) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 540 and Radeon 550

Radeon RX 540
The Radeon RX 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 11 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1124 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,134 points.

Radeon 550
The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 540 scores 2,134 and the Radeon 550 reaches 2,140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 540 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 540) vs 512 (Radeon 550). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 540) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 550). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,134 | 2,140 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS+3% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz+3% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 540 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 550 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 540 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon RX 540) vs 256 KB (Radeon 550) — the Radeon RX 540 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 540 draws 50W versus the Radeon 550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 540) vs 300W (Radeon 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 42.7 | 42.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 540 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon 550 launched at $79 and now averages $79. The Radeon RX 540 costs 49.4% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.4 (Radeon RX 540) vs 27.1 (Radeon 550) — the Radeon RX 540 offers 97% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $79-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-49% | $79 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.4+97% | 27.1 |
| Codename | Lexa | Lexa |
| Release | November 11 2017 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #602 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













