
Radeon RX 540 vs Radeon RX 640

Radeon RX 540
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 640
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 540 is positioned at rank 235 and the Radeon RX 640 is on rank 323, so the Radeon RX 540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 540
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 640
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 640 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 640 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 540 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 640 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 540.
| Insight | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 540 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $55 for the Radeon RX 640, it costs 27% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 35.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+35.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 540 and Radeon RX 640

Radeon RX 540
The Radeon RX 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 11 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1124 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,134 points.

Radeon RX 640
The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 540 scores 2,134 and the Radeon RX 640 reaches 2,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 540 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 540) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 540) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,134 | 2,172+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS | 1.559 TFLOPS+25% |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 1218 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 640 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 540 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon RX 540) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 540) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 540 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 540) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 42.7 | 43.4+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 540 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159 and now averages $55. The Radeon RX 540 costs 27.3% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.4 (Radeon RX 540) vs 39.5 (Radeon RX 640) — the Radeon RX 540 offers 35.2% better value. The Radeon RX 640 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-38% | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-27% | $55 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.4+35% | 39.5 |
| Codename | Lexa | Polaris 23 |
| Release | November 11 2017 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #602 | #665 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













