Radeon 550 vs Radeon RX 540

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 540

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

92%

#225

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

504%

#227

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

456%

#228

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

455%

#232

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

414%

#233

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

411%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

100%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

99%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

98%

#239

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

96%

#240

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

96%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 540 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon 550	Radeon RX 540
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 540 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 540 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $79), it costs 49% less, resulting in a 96.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon 550	Radeon RX 540
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+96.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($79)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 550 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 540 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 550 and Radeon RX 540

Radeon 550

The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon RX 540

The Radeon RX 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 11 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1124 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,134 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 550 scores 2,140 and the Radeon RX 540 reaches 2,134 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 550) vs 512 (Radeon RX 540). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 550) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 540). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1219 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 550	Radeon RX 540
G3D Mark Score	2,140	2,134
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS	1.248 TFLOPS+3%
Boost Clock	1183 MHz	1219 MHz+3%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 550	Radeon RX 540
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 550 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 540 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 540 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon 550) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 540) — the Radeon RX 540 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 550	Radeon RX 540
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 550 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 540's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 550) vs 350W (Radeon RX 540). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 550	Radeon RX 540
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	42.8	42.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 550 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $79, while the Radeon RX 540 launched at $99 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 540 costs 49.4% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.1 (Radeon 550) vs 53.4 (Radeon RX 540) — the Radeon RX 540 offers 97% better value.