Quadro K620 vs Radeon 550

NVIDIA

Quadro K620

2014Core: 1058 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 89.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 27.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon 550

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $71 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 83.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro K620 better than Radeon 550?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,213 vs 2,140 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro K620 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K620 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro K620 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro K620 is about 89.9% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $79 MSRP, and you are getting 3.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 550 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon 550 make more sense than Quadro K620?
Yes. Radeon 550 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $79 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro K620. The trade-off is that Quadro K620 currently gives you 3.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 550 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro K620Radeon 550
1080p
low20 FPS37 FPS
medium12 FPS22 FPS
high7 FPS16 FPS
ultra4 FPS9 FPS
1440p
low9 FPS24 FPS
medium5 FPS14 FPS
high2 FPS8 FPS
ultra1 FPS4 FPS
4K
low4 FPS9 FPS
medium2 FPS6 FPS
high1 FPS4 FPS
ultra1 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro K620Radeon 550
1080p
low77 FPS60 FPS
medium48 FPS35 FPS
high35 FPS27 FPS
ultra22 FPS17 FPS
1440p
low22 FPS17 FPS
medium16 FPS11 FPS
high11 FPS8 FPS
ultra8 FPS6 FPS
4K
low6 FPS5 FPS
medium4 FPS3 FPS
high4 FPS3 FPS
ultra3 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro K620Radeon 550
1080p
low100 FPS96 FPS
medium80 FPS77 FPS
high66 FPS64 FPS
ultra50 FPS48 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS72 FPS
medium60 FPS58 FPS
high50 FPS48 FPS
ultra37 FPS36 FPS
4K
low50 FPS48 FPS
medium40 FPS39 FPS
high33 FPS32 FPS
ultra25 FPS24 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro K620Radeon 550
1080p
low100 FPS96 FPS
medium80 FPS77 FPS
high66 FPS64 FPS
ultra50 FPS48 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS65 FPS
medium60 FPS50 FPS
high50 FPS41 FPS
ultra37 FPS29 FPS
4K
low50 FPS34 FPS
medium40 FPS26 FPS
high33 FPS21 FPS
ultra25 FPS14 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K620 and Radeon 550

NVIDIA

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

AMD

Radeon 550

The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Radeon 550 reaches 2,140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 512 (Radeon 550). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 550). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon 550
G3D Mark Score
2,213+3%
2,140
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1183 MHz+5%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon 550
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon 550) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon 550
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Radeon 550's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 300W (Radeon 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon 550
TDP
45W-10%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Perf/Watt
49.2+15%
42.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K620 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon 550 launched at $79. The Radeon 550 costs 47.3% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Quadro K620) vs 27.1 (Radeon 550) — the Radeon 550 offers 83.1% better value. The Radeon 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon 550
MSRP
$150
$79-47%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
27.1+83%
Codename
GM107
Lexa
Release
July 22 2014
April 20 2017
Ranking
#660
#668