
Quadro K620
Popular choices:

Radeon 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro K620
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌89.9% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 27.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Radeon 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro K620
2014Radeon 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌89.9% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 27.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro K620 better than Radeon 550?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 550 make more sense than Quadro K620?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K620 and Radeon 550

Quadro K620
Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Radeon 550
Radeon 550
The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Radeon 550 reaches 2,140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 512 (Radeon 550). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 550). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,213+3% | 2,140 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1183 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon 550) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Radeon 550's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 300W (Radeon 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-10% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 49.2+15% | 42.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K620 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon 550 launched at $79. The Radeon 550 costs 47.3% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Quadro K620) vs 27.1 (Radeon 550) — the Radeon 550 offers 83.1% better value. The Radeon 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $79-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | 27.1+83% |
| Codename | GM107 | Lexa |
| Release | July 22 2014 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #660 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













