Quadro K620 vs Radeon 550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon 550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
89.9% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 27.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon 550

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K620 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K620 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.4% in PassMark G3D (2,213 vs 2,140), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $71 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 83.6% (27.1 vs 14.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K620 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Radeon 550

The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Radeon 550 reaches 2,140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 512 (Radeon 550). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 550). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon 550
G3D Mark Score	2,213+3%	2,140
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	1.211 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1183 MHz+5%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon 550
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620 and 64-bit on the Radeon 550. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon 550) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon 550
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Radeon 550's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 300W (Radeon 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon 550
TDP	45W-10%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	49.2+15%	42.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K620 came in at $150, while the Radeon 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon 550 was 47.3% cheaper ($71 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Quadro K620) vs 27.1 (Radeon 550) — the Radeon 550 offers 83.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 550 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon 550
MSRP	$150	$79-47%
Performance per Dollar	14.8	27.1+83%
Codename	GM107	Lexa
Release	July 22 2014	April 20 2017
Ranking	#660	#668

Search Quadro K620 on Amazon

Search Radeon 550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.