GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Quadro K620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

2011

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 560M SLI better than Quadro K620?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,274 vs 2,213 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 560M SLI is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 2.8% higher G3D Mark. Quadro K620 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Quadro K620 make more sense than GeForce GTX 560M SLI?

Yes. Quadro K620 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 100W), and staying closer to $150 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 560M SLI. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 560M SLI currently gives you 2.8% higher G3D Mark. Quadro K620 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI Benchmark Check

Quadro K620 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	Quadro K620
1080p
low	64 FPS	20 FPS
medium	53 FPS	12 FPS
high	36 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	4 FPS
1440p
low	51 FPS	9 FPS
medium	43 FPS	5 FPS
high	26 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	21 FPS	4 FPS
medium	20 FPS	2 FPS
high	12 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 560M SLI Open Quadro K620

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	Quadro K620
1080p
low	67 FPS	77 FPS
medium	45 FPS	48 FPS
high	33 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	38 FPS	22 FPS
medium	21 FPS	16 FPS
high	15 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	13 FPS	6 FPS
medium	8 FPS	4 FPS
high	6 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 560M SLI Open Quadro K620

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	Quadro K620
1080p
low	102 FPS	100 FPS
medium	82 FPS	80 FPS
high	68 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	75 FPS
medium	61 FPS	60 FPS
high	51 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	50 FPS
medium	41 FPS	40 FPS
high	34 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 560M SLI Open Quadro K620

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	Quadro K620
1080p
low	102 FPS	100 FPS
medium	82 FPS	80 FPS
high	68 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	75 FPS
medium	61 FPS	60 FPS
high	51 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	50 FPS
medium	41 FPS	40 FPS
high	34 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 560M SLI Open Quadro K620

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560M SLI and Quadro K620

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,274 points.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI scores 2,274 and the Quadro K620 reaches 2,213 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is built on Fermi while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 384 (Quadro K620).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	Quadro K620
G3D Mark Score	2,274+3%	2,213
Architecture	Fermi	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	Quadro K620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	Quadro K620
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI draws 100W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.