GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Quadro K620

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

2011Core: 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K620

2014Core: 1058 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Quadro K620 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Quadro K620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Quadro K620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

2011

Why buy it

  • 46.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (2,274 vs 2,213), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K620 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 560M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Quadro K620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,274 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI scores 2,274 and the Quadro K620 reaches 2,213 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is built on Fermi while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 384 (Quadro K620).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIQuadro K620
G3D Mark Score
2,274+3%
2,213
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIQuadro K620
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560M SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro K620.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIQuadro K620
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI draws 100W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIQuadro K620
TDP
100W
45W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
22.7
49.2+117%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K620 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIQuadro K620
MSRP
$150
Codename
N12E-GS
GM107
Release
January 6 2011
July 22 2014
Ranking
#632
#660

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.