GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

2011Core: 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M470

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

2011

Why buy it

  • 62.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M470

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 62.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M470 instead at 2,331 vs 2,274, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M470 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M470 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 560M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,274 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M470

The Radeon R9 M470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,331 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI scores 2,274 and the Radeon R9 M470 reaches 2,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M470 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M470).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIRadeon R9 M470
G3D Mark Score
2,274
2,331+3%
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M470 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIRadeon R9 M470
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M470 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M470 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M470.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIRadeon R9 M470
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M470's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIRadeon R9 M470
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
22.7
31.1+37%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 M470 (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560M SLIRadeon R9 M470
MSRP
$350
Codename
N12E-GS
Emerald
Release
January 6 2011
May 15 2016
Ranking
#632
#649

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.