Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 6970M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 6970M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 6970M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6970M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6970M

2011

Why buy it

✅20.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6970M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (2,270 vs 2,213), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6970M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 6970M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Radeon HD 6970M

The Radeon HD 6970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,270 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Radeon HD 6970M reaches 2,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6970M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6970M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970M).

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6970M
G3D Mark Score	2,213	2,270+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	960+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+51%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	48+100%
L1 Cache	192 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6970M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620 and System on the Radeon HD 6970M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6970M) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6970M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 6970M's 75W — a 50% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6970M
TDP	45W-40%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	49.2+62%	30.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K620 (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6970M
MSRP	$150	—
Codename	GM107	Blackcomb
Release	July 22 2014	January 4 2011
Ranking	#660	#654

Search Quadro K620 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6970M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.