FirePro D500
Quadro K620
FirePro D500 vs Quadro K620 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro D500 vs Quadro K620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro D500 vs Quadro K620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro D500
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌508.9% higher power demand at 274W vs 45W.
Quadro K620
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 224.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 274W, a 229W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro D500 vs Quadro K620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro D500
The FirePro D500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,272 points.
Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro D500 scores 2,272 and the Quadro K620 reaches 2,213 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D500 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (FirePro D500) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 2.227 TFLOPS (FirePro D500) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,272+3% | 2,213 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.227 TFLOPS+158% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+100% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro D500 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620 carries 2 GB. FirePro D500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro D500 and 64-bit on the Quadro K620. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro D500) vs 2 MB (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D500 draws 274W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 143.6% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D500) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 45W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.3 | 49.2+493% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro D500 came in at $500, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150. On MSRP, Quadro K620 was 70% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro D500) vs 14.8 (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 offers 228.9% better value.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5 | 14.8+229% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GM107 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #484 | #660 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro D500 and Quadro K620
