Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 6870

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 6870 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 6870: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 151W, a 106W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6870 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6870

2010

Why buy it

✅48.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
59.3% HIGHER MSRP
$239 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌235.6% higher power demand at 151W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6870 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K620 instead at 2,213 vs 2,206, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $89 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $239, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 59.8% (14.8 vs 9.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 6870 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 6870 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Radeon HD 6870

The Radeon HD 6870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,206 points. Launch price was $239.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Radeon HD 6870 reaches 2,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6870 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 6870). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6870). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 900 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6870
G3D Mark Score	2,213	2,206
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1120+192%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	2.016 TFLOPS+134%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz+25%	900 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	192 KB	224 KB+17%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6870
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6870. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6870) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6870
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 6870's 151W — a 108.2% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6870
TDP	45W-70%	151W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	—	247mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	49.2+237%	14.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K620 came in at $150, while the Radeon HD 6870 launched at $239. On MSRP, Quadro K620 was 37.2% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Quadro K620) vs 9.2 (Radeon HD 6870) — the Quadro K620 offers 60.9% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K620 (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 6870
MSRP	$150-37%	$239
Performance per Dollar	14.8+61%	9.2
Codename	GM107	Barts
Release	July 22 2014	October 21 2010
Ranking	#660	#661

Search Quadro K620 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6870 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.