
Quadro K620
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K620 is positioned at rank #99 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6870.
| Insight | Quadro K620 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (247mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K620 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K620 and Radeon HD 6870

Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Radeon HD 6870
The Radeon HD 6870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,206 points. Launch price was $239.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Radeon HD 6870 reaches 2,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6870 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 6870). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6870). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,213 | 2,206 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1120+192% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 2.016 TFLOPS+134% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+25% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 224 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6870) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 6870's 151W — a 108.2% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-70% | 151W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 247mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 49.2+237% | 14.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K620 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 6870 launched at $239 and now averages $50. The Quadro K620 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 73.8 (Quadro K620) vs 44.1 (Radeon HD 6870) — the Quadro K620 offers 67.3% better value. The Quadro K620 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro K620 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-37% | $239 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.8+67% | 44.1 |
| Codename | GM107 | Barts |
| Release | July 22 2014 | October 21 2010 |
| Ranking | #660 | #661 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















