
Quadro K620

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Quadro K620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro K620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K620
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,213 | 2,200 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+1100% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1450 MHz+29% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K620 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K620 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs carries 0 MB. Quadro K620 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs's 15W — a 100% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 15W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 49.2 | 146.7+198% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K620 came in at $150, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Quadro K620) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K620 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | July 22 2014 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #660 | #744 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















