Quadro K620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

NVIDIA

Quadro K620

2014Core: 1058 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K620 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (2,213 vs 2,200), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureQuadro K620UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
G3D Mark Score
2,213
2,200
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 12
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384+1100%
32
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1450 MHz+29%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K620UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K620 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs carries 0 MB. Quadro K620 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.

FeatureQuadro K620UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs's 15W — a 100% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro K620UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
TDP
45W
15W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Perf/Watt
49.2
146.7+198%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K620 came in at $150, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Quadro K620) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro K620UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
MSRP
$150
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
Infinity
Codename
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
July 22 2014
March 30 2021
Ranking
#660
#744

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.