GRID M60-1B vs Quadro K620
GRID M60-1B
Popular choices:
Quadro K620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M60-1B is positioned at rank 357 and the Quadro K620 is on rank 99, so the Quadro K620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K620.
| Insight | GRID M60-1B | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $120), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 292.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M60-1B | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+292.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-1B and Quadro K620
GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.
Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-1B scores 2,256 and the Quadro K620 reaches 2,213 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1B) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,256+2% | 2,213 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+459% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+5% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+300% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-1B draws 225W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1B) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 45W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 49.2+392% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-1B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The Quadro K620 costs 75% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.8 (GRID M60-1B) vs 73.8 (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 offers 292.6% better value. The GRID M60-1B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $150-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $30-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.8 | 73.8+293% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #525 | #660 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M60-1B and Quadro K620
