
GRID M60-1B vs Quadro M600M

GRID M60-1B
Popular choices:

Quadro M600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M60-1B is positioned at rank 357 and the Quadro M600M is on rank 25, so the Quadro M600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M600M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M600M.
| Insight | GRID M60-1B | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M60-1B remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-1B and Quadro M600M

GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.

Quadro M600M
The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-1B scores 2,256 and the Quadro M600M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro M600M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1B) vs 384 (Quadro M600M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B) vs 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,256+2% | 2,221 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+617% | 0.6728 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+34% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+700% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-1B) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-1B draws 225W versus the Quadro M600M's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1B) vs 350W (Quadro M600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 74.0+640% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











