GeForce MX150
VS
GRID M60-1B

GeForce MX150 vs GRID M60-1B

NVIDIA

GeForce MX150

2017Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
VS

GRID M60-1B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX150 is positioned at rank 304 and the GRID M60-1B is on rank 357, so the GeForce MX150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX150

#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
100%
#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
93%
#294
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
723%
#296
656%
#297
654%
#301
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
595%
#302
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
591%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
100%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
98%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
98%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
95%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
94%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B

#341
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
16414%
#357
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
100%
#358
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
99%
#359
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
98%
#360
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
98%
#361
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
96%
#363
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
90%
#364
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
89%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
89%
#366
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
88%
#367
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
87%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
87%
#369
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
79%
#370
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
76%
#371
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M60-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX150.

InsightGeForce MX150GRID M60-1B
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce MX150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce MX150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $120), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 99.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce MX150GRID M60-1B
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+99.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX150 and GRID M60-1B

NVIDIA

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-1B

The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the GRID M60-1B reaches 2,256 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the GRID M60-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1B). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX150GRID M60-1B
G3D Mark Score
2,252
2,256
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+505%
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1178 MHz+13%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
144 KB
768 KB+433%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce MX150GRID M60-1B
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX150) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-1B) — the GRID M60-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce MX150GRID M60-1B
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce MX150GRID M60-1B
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12_1
Max Displays
3
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the GRID M60-1B's 225W — a 183% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 350W (GRID M60-1B). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX150GRID M60-1B
TDP
10W-96%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
225.2+2152%
10.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX150 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GRID M60-1B launched at $2500 and now averages $120. The GeForce MX150 costs 50% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.5 (GeForce MX150) vs 18.8 (GRID M60-1B) — the GeForce MX150 offers 99.5% better value. The GeForce MX150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce MX150GRID M60-1B
MSRP
$150-94%
$2500
Avg Price (30d)
$60-50%
$120
Performance per Dollar
37.5+99%
18.8
Codename
GP108
GM204
Release
May 17 2017
August 30 2015
Ranking
#657
#525