GeForce MX150 vs GRID M60-1B

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX150 vs GRID M60-1B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX150 vs GRID M60-1B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX150

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1563.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 225W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M60-1B

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1566.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌2150% higher power demand at 225W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-1B is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (2,256 vs 2,252), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,350 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1563.7% (15.0 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M60-1B still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX150 vs GRID M60-1B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

GRID M60-1B

The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the GRID M60-1B reaches 2,256 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the GRID M60-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1B). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX150	GRID M60-1B
G3D Mark Score	2,252	2,256
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+505%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1178 MHz+13%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	128+433%
L1 Cache	144 KB	768 KB+433%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX150 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-1B leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX150	GRID M60-1B
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX150 and 64-bit on the GRID M60-1B. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX150) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-1B) — the GRID M60-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX150	GRID M60-1B
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce MX150	GRID M60-1B
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Max Displays	3	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the GRID M60-1B's 225W — a 183% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 350W (GRID M60-1B). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX150	GRID M60-1B
TDP	10W-96%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	225.2+2152%	10.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX150 came in at $150, while the GRID M60-1B launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce MX150 was 94% cheaper ($2350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX150) vs 0.9 (GRID M60-1B) — the GeForce MX150 offers 1566.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX150 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce MX150	GRID M60-1B
MSRP	$150-94%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	15.0+1567%	0.9
Codename	GP108	GM204
Release	May 17 2017	August 30 2015
Ranking	#657	#525

Search GeForce MX150 on Amazon

Search GRID M60-1B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.